We investigate experimentally the effect of consultation (unincentivized advice) on choices under risk in an incentivized investment task. We compare consultation to two benchmark treatments: one with isolated individual choices, and a second with group choice after communication. Our benchmark treatments replicate findings that groups take more risk than individuals in the investment task; content analysis of group discussions reveals that higher risktaking in groups is positively correlated with mentions of expected value. In our consultation treatments, we find evidence of peer effects: decisions within the peer group are significantly correlated. However, average risk-taking after consultation is not significantly different from isolated individual choices. We also find that risk-taking after consultation is not affected by adding a feedback stage in which subjects see the choices of their consultation peers.
Download the paper in PDF format
, Jeroen Nieboer and
View all CeDEx discussion papers | View all School of Economics featured discussion papers
Sir Clive Granger BuildingÀÖ²¥´«Ã½University Park ÀÖ²¥´«Ã½, NG7 2RD
telephone: +44 (0)115 951 5458 Enquiries: jose.guinotsaporta@nottingham.ac.ukExperiments: cedex@nottingham.ac.uk